In a stunning revelation that could reshape our understanding of global leadership, a new report has estimated the IQ levels of 195 world leaders, sparking immediate debate about intelligence and governance. This groundbreaking analysis highlights a stark contrast in cognitive abilities among heads of state, from the sharp intellect of Argentina’s Javier Milei, boasting an IQ of 135, to the alarming low of Angola’s João Lourenço, estimated at just 25.

The findings, based on verified sources and expert assessments, unveil a spectrum of intellectual prowess. Leaders like Belgium’s Alexander De Croo (IQ 132) and Australia’s Anthony Albanese (IQ 125) stand out as exemplars of high cognitive ability, while others, such as Panama’s José Raul Mulino, with an IQ of 97, raise eyebrows about their decision-making capabilities.

As political tensions rise globally, the implications of these IQ estimates are profound. Countries with leaders of lower estimated IQs may struggle with complex international issues, while those with higher IQs could navigate crises more adeptly. The report also reveals that many leaders, including Egypt’s Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (IQ 107) and France’s Emmanuel Macron (IQ 107), fall within the average range, illustrating a potential correlation between intelligence and effective governance.

The urgency of this information cannot be overstated. As nations grapple with pressing challenges—climate change, economic instability, and geopolitical strife—understanding the cognitive strengths and weaknesses of their leaders may prove crucial. This unprecedented look into the minds of those shaping our world invites citizens and analysts alike to reconsider the attributes that define effective leadership in these turbulent times. The question remains: will intelligence alone dictate the future, or will other factors come into play?